Last updated: March 29, 2026
Quick Summary: Best Harassment Prevention Training at a Glance
| Platform | Best For | Video Quality | State-Specific | Languages | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traliant | Best-in-class US harassment training content | Excellent (cinematic) | All mandating states | 12+ | Custom quote |
| EasyLlama | Fast US SMB deployment with state compliance | Good (interactive) | All mandating states | 6+ | ~$12,499/yr |
| CompliQuest | Global organisations + EU harassment/regulatory | High (expert-produced) | US coverage + EU directives | Multiple | Custom quote |
| SHIFT by Moxie | Culture change through behavioural science | Excellent (documentary-style) | California, NY, IL, CT | 3 | ~$15-25/user/yr |
| Kantola | Mid-market with interactive video scenarios | Very good (branching video) | All mandating states | 3 | ~$20-30/user/yr |
| Emtrain | Data-driven workplace culture analytics | Good (workplace scenarios) | All mandating states | 4 | Custom quote |
| Clear Law Institute | Budget-friendly legal accuracy | Adequate (presenter-led) | All mandating states | 3 | ~$10-15/user/yr |
| Navex | Enterprise ethics and compliance suites | Good (professional) | Major mandating states | 8+ | Enterprise quote |
Reading time: 27 min read
Why Harassment Prevention Training Matters
Workplace harassment remains one of the most persistent and costly challenges facing organisations worldwide. Despite decades of awareness campaigns and legal requirements, the problem continues at alarming scale.
| Statistic | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| EEOC charges filed (FY 2023) | 81,055 total (includes 27,291 sex-based) | EEOC Annual Performance Report FY 2023 |
| Monetary relief secured by EEOC | $665.5 million (FY 2023) | EEOC Annual Performance Report FY 2023 |
| Workers who experience harassment | ~1 in 3 (survey data) | EEOC Select Task Force on Harassment (2016, updated) |
| Harassment that goes unreported | ~75% of incidents | EEOC Select Task Force on Harassment |
| Average settlement cost | $75,000-$125,000 (per claim) | Hiscox Workplace Harassment Study 2024 |
| States mandating training | 8+ (and growing) | Various state legislatures |
| Cost of employee turnover from harassment | $2.6 billion annually (US estimate) | Rand Corporation research |
Beyond the legal and financial implications, workplace harassment inflicts real harm on employees and organisational culture. The EEOC Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace found that harassment leads to decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, higher turnover, and significant mental health consequences for targets. The economic cost extends far beyond legal settlements -- a toxic culture drives away talent, undermines team performance, and damages employer brand.
The regulatory landscape continues to tighten. Multiple US states now mandate specific harassment prevention training (detailed below), and the trend toward more prescriptive requirements is accelerating. In the EU, the EU Directive on combating violence against women and domestic violence (2024) and national implementations are creating new training obligations for European employers. The UK's Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023, effective October 2024, introduced a proactive duty on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment -- making training not just recommended but effectively required.
Choosing the right harassment prevention training platform is not just about ticking a compliance box. It is about investing in content that actually changes behaviour, protects employees, and builds the kind of workplace culture that attracts and retains talent.
State-by-State Legal Requirements
US state harassment training mandates vary significantly in scope, duration, frequency, and covered employers:
| State | Who Must Be Trained | Duration | Frequency | Covered Employers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California (SB 1343) | All employees (1 hr) + supervisors (2 hrs) | 1-2 hours | Every 2 years | 5+ employees |
| New York (Section 201-g) | All employees | No minimum (must meet content requirements) | Annual | All employers |
| Illinois (WSHA) | All employees | 1 hour minimum | Annual | All employers |
| Connecticut | All employees (2 hrs) + supervisors (2 hrs) | 2 hours | New hires within 6 months; supplemental every 10 years | 3+ employees |
| Delaware | Employees (1 hr) + supervisors (2 hrs) | 1-2 hours | Every 2 years | 50+ employees |
| Maine | All employees + supervisors | "Education and training" (no time minimum) | New employees within 1 year | 15+ employees |
| Washington D.C. | Tipped employees and managers | Varies | Annual | Tipped employers |
| New York City (Stop Sexual Harassment Act) | All employees | 1 hour minimum | Annual | 15+ employees (anti-harassment policy for all) |
Important note: These requirements change frequently as states update their laws. Always verify current requirements with legal counsel. Several additional states (including Massachusetts, Vermont, and Oregon) have introduced or are considering mandatory training legislation.
How We Evaluated These Platforms
We assessed each platform across seven dimensions specific to harassment prevention training:
| Criterion | What We Assessed |
|---|---|
| Video production quality | Acting quality, diversity of actors, realistic scenarios, production values |
| State-specific compliance | Coverage of all mandating states, auto-updating for legislative changes |
| Content depth | Topics covered (sexual harassment, bullying, retaliation, bystander intervention, manager responsibilities) |
| Customisation | Ability to add company policies, reporting procedures, CEO messages, industry-specific scenarios |
| Language support | Number of languages, quality of translations/native content |
| Certifications and tracking | Completion certificates, audit trail, compliance reporting |
| Cultural approach | Beyond legal compliance -- does the training address culture change and bystander intervention? |
We also reviewed ratings from G2, Capterra, and HR.com research.
1. Traliant
Website: traliant.com
Traliant is widely regarded as the gold standard for US harassment prevention training. Founded by Michael Johnson, a former employment attorney, the company brings genuine legal expertise to its content -- every course is reviewed by employment lawyers and updated promptly when legislation changes.
Traliant's harassment training courses feature cinematic-quality video production with professional actors depicting realistic workplace scenarios. The diversity of characters and situations is notable: scenarios cover various industries, workplace settings (office, remote, hybrid, healthcare, hospitality, construction), and relationship dynamics (peer-to-peer, supervisor-subordinate, customer/client harassment). The content covers sexual harassment, non-sexual harassment, discrimination, retaliation, bystander intervention, and manager-specific responsibilities.
State-specific compliance is Traliant's particular strength. The platform automatically delivers the correct version of training based on the employee's state, duration requirement, and role (employee vs. supervisor). When states update their training requirements, Traliant updates its courses promptly -- organisations do not need to manage version control. Traliant covers all mandating states including California (SB 1343), New York (Section 201-g and NYC Stop Sexual Harassment Act), Illinois (WSHA), Connecticut, Delaware, and Maine.
Customisation options are strong. Organisations can add their company logo and branding, include a CEO welcome message, insert company-specific policies and reporting procedures, and add custom scenarios relevant to their industry. This "semi-custom" approach provides meaningful personalisation without the cost and timeline of fully custom development.
Traliant also offers courses beyond harassment: DEI training, code of conduct, anti-bribery, data privacy (US-focused), and workplace safety. However, the harassment prevention content is where Traliant truly excels.
Pros:
- Best-in-class video production quality with diverse, realistic workplace scenarios
- Founded and advised by employment attorneys -- strong legal accuracy and rapid legislative updates
- Comprehensive state-specific compliance with automatic version delivery
- Strong customisation options (branding, policies, CEO message, industry scenarios)
Cons:
- Primarily US-focused -- very limited EU or international harassment/workplace directive coverage
- Premium pricing compared to some competitors
- Does not cover broader regulatory compliance topics (GDPR, cybersecurity, NIS2) in depth
Best for: US organisations that want the highest-quality harassment prevention training content with state-specific compliance and meaningful customisation.
Pricing: Custom quotes. Pricing varies based on number of employees, courses selected, and customisation requirements.
2. EasyLlama
Website: easyllama.com
EasyLlama has established itself as a popular choice for US small and mid-sized businesses that need fast, affordable harassment prevention training. The platform's key selling point is speed of deployment: organisations can be assigning training within hours of signing up, with minimal configuration required.
EasyLlama's harassment prevention courses use an interactive, scenario-based approach. Rather than long-form video, the courses present workplace situations through a mix of short video clips, illustrated scenarios, interactive questions, and knowledge checks. This approach keeps completion times manageable (typically 1-2 hours depending on state requirements) and maintains engagement through interactivity rather than passive viewing.
The platform covers all US states with mandatory harassment training requirements, automatically delivering the correct state-specific version. Content is regularly updated for legislative changes, and EasyLlama provides separate courses for employees and supervisors where required. Beyond harassment, the platform covers cybersecurity awareness, workplace safety, DEI, and ethics -- making it a reasonably comprehensive compliance training solution for US SMBs.
EasyLlama integrates with popular HRIS platforms (BambooHR, Rippling, Gusto, ADP), which simplifies employee roster management and training assignment. The platform's administrative dashboard provides completion tracking, deadline management, and compliance reporting.
Pros:
- Very fast deployment -- organisations can launch training within hours
- All US mandating states covered with automatic state-specific delivery
- User-friendly interface with high completion rates
- Good HRIS integrations for SMBs (BambooHR, Rippling, Gusto, ADP)
Cons:
- Video production quality is not as high as Traliant or SHIFT -- more interactive/illustrated than cinematic
- Limited EU/international coverage for harassment and workplace directives
- Customisation options are basic compared to Traliant (primarily branding, limited policy integration)
- Pricing not publicly transparent
Best for: US-based small and mid-sized businesses that need compliant, state-specific harassment training with fast deployment and simple administration.
Pricing: Not publicly listed. Industry estimates suggest starting at approximately $12,499/year for small teams. Per-user pricing available for larger organisations.
3. CompliQuest
Website: compliquest.com
CompliQuest approaches harassment prevention training within the context of comprehensive global compliance. While platforms like Traliant and EasyLlama focus primarily on US state-specific harassment mandates, CompliQuest covers harassment prevention alongside the full spectrum of regulatory compliance -- GDPR, NIS2, anti-bribery (FCPA, UK Bribery Act), cybersecurity awareness, workplace safety, whistleblower protection, and more.
This integrated approach is particularly valuable for multinational organisations. A company with employees in California, New York, Germany, and Croatia does not just need California SB 1343 compliance. It needs training that addresses US federal and state harassment laws, the EU Directive on combating violence against women, national implementations of EU workplace directives, GDPR implications of harassment investigations, and whistleblower protection requirements for employees who report harassment. CompliQuest's expert-built content addresses these intersections natively rather than treating each jurisdiction as an isolated requirement.
CompliQuest's harassment prevention content covers sexual harassment, non-sexual harassment (bullying, intimidation, hostile work environment), retaliation, bystander intervention, manager and supervisor responsibilities, reporting procedures, and investigation awareness. The content is developed by compliance professionals with direct regulatory expertise, ensuring both legal accuracy and practical applicability.
The platform's custom training capability is a key differentiator. CompliQuest's expert team can develop bespoke harassment prevention courses that incorporate an organisation's specific policies, reporting channels, investigation procedures, industry-specific scenarios, and cultural considerations. This is especially valuable for organisations in sectors with unique harassment dynamics (healthcare, hospitality, construction, education) or those operating across jurisdictions with different legal frameworks.
Pros:
- Harassment prevention integrated with full regulatory compliance (GDPR, NIS2, anti-bribery, whistleblower)
- Genuine global coverage -- US and EU workplace directives, not just US state mandates
- Expert-built custom training tailored to organisation-specific policies and industry risks
- Multilingual content developed natively (not machine-translated)
Cons:
- US state-specific harassment course library is smaller than Traliant's or EasyLlama's
- Newer brand with less market recognition in the US harassment training space
- No free trial -- requires contact for demo and pricing
Best for: Multinational organisations that need harassment prevention training as part of comprehensive global compliance -- especially those operating across US and EU jurisdictions with overlapping harassment, data protection, and workplace safety obligations.
Pricing: Custom quotes based on organisation size and training requirements. Contact CompliQuest for pricing.
Explore CompliQuest compliance courses -- harassment prevention, GDPR, cybersecurity, and more in one platform.
4. SHIFT by Moxie
Website: moxietraining.com
SHIFT (formerly called "SHIFT" by Moxie Media) takes a deliberately different approach to harassment prevention training. Rather than focusing primarily on legal compliance, SHIFT aims to change workplace culture through behavioural science. The programme is grounded in research on bystander intervention, unconscious bias, and organisational psychology -- and it shows in both the content and the delivery.
SHIFT's training courses use a documentary-style format featuring real employees (not actors) sharing their experiences with workplace harassment. This approach creates an authenticity that scripted scenarios cannot replicate. The content is emotionally impactful without being preachy, and it effectively communicates both the human cost of harassment and the concrete actions individuals can take to prevent it.
The bystander intervention component is SHIFT's strongest feature. While most harassment training focuses on what constitutes harassment and how to report it, SHIFT provides specific, practised techniques for intervening when witnessing inappropriate behaviour. The "5D" bystander intervention framework (Direct, Distract, Delegate, Delay, Document) gives employees actionable tools rather than abstract principles.
SHIFT meets state-specific requirements for California, New York, Illinois, and Connecticut. However, its state coverage is narrower than Traliant's or EasyLlama's, and the platform does not cover all mandating states equally.
Pros:
- Unique documentary-style format with real people -- authentic and emotionally impactful
- Best-in-class bystander intervention training based on behavioural science research
- Focus on culture change, not just legal compliance
- Strong facilitator guides for organisations wanting to combine online and in-person training
Cons:
- Narrower state-specific coverage than Traliant or EasyLlama (strong on CA, NY, IL, CT but less comprehensive elsewhere)
- Limited language support compared to larger platforms
- Not a comprehensive compliance platform -- focused specifically on harassment/culture
- Documentary style may need refreshing more frequently than scenario-based content
Best for: Organisations that want harassment prevention training focused on genuine culture change and bystander intervention, not just legal compliance.
Pricing: Approximately $15-25/user/year depending on organisation size. Enterprise pricing available.
5. Kantola
Website: kantola.com
Kantola has been producing harassment prevention training for over 30 years, making it one of the longest-established providers in this space. The company's training approach centres on interactive, branching video scenarios where employees make decisions and see the consequences of different actions.
Kantola's branching video format is engaging and effective. Rather than passively watching a scenario play out, learners choose how a character should respond at key decision points. Different choices lead to different outcomes, illustrating how small decisions can escalate or de-escalate harassment situations. This interactive approach promotes active learning and has been shown to improve knowledge retention compared to linear video.
The video production quality is strong, with professional actors, diverse casting, and realistic workplace settings. Kantola covers all major harassment types (sexual harassment, bullying, discrimination, hostile work environment) and meets requirements for all mandating states. The platform provides separate employee and supervisor versions, with manager training including additional content on receiving complaints, conducting investigations, and avoiding retaliation.
Kantola also offers a course authoring tool that allows organisations to integrate their policies, reporting procedures, and company-specific information directly into the training. The platform's compliance tracking features include automated reminders, completion certificates, and audit-ready reporting.
Pros:
- Engaging branching video format that promotes active learning and decision-making
- 30+ years of experience in harassment prevention training
- Strong video production quality with diverse, realistic scenarios
- Good compliance tracking and automated reminder capabilities
Cons:
- Platform and interface can feel less modern than newer competitors
- Limited content beyond harassment prevention (not a comprehensive compliance platform)
- Language support is limited (primarily English, Spanish, and Mandarin)
- Pricing can be higher per-user than newer disruptors
Best for: Mid-market organisations that value interactive, branching-video learning for harassment prevention and want a proven provider with decades of experience.
Pricing: Approximately $20-30/user/year. Volume discounts available for larger organisations.
6. Emtrain
Website: emtrain.com
Emtrain differentiates itself through workplace culture analytics. While other providers focus on delivering training content, Emtrain uses training interactions as a data source to measure and benchmark workplace culture health. The platform's Workplace Culture Diagnostic analyses employee responses during training to identify cultural risk indicators, skill gaps, and areas of concern -- before they escalate into harassment complaints or legal issues.
Emtrain's harassment prevention training covers standard topics (sexual harassment, workplace bullying, retaliation, bystander intervention) through realistic workplace scenarios. The content is well-produced and meets state-specific requirements across all mandating states. What makes it different is the embedded analytics: as employees complete training, their responses to scenarios and knowledge assessments are anonymised and aggregated to produce a Workplace Culture Index score for the organisation.
This data-driven approach enables organisations to move beyond reactive compliance (training after an incident) to proactive culture management (identifying and addressing cultural risks before they manifest). Emtrain benchmarks an organisation's culture scores against industry averages, providing context for understanding where specific risks lie.
Emtrain also offers courses on DEI, ethics, code of conduct, and manager effectiveness. The platform integrates with major HRIS systems and provides comprehensive compliance reporting.
Pros:
- Unique workplace culture analytics and diagnostics -- turns training into a data source
- Proactive risk identification through culture benchmarking
- Meets all mandating state requirements with automatic version delivery
- Good manager training content including complaint handling and investigation awareness
Cons:
- Smaller company with less brand recognition than Traliant or EasyLlama
- Culture analytics feature requires significant buy-in from HR and leadership to be useful
- Video production quality is good but not best-in-class
- Limited international/EU coverage
Best for: Data-driven HR teams that want to use harassment prevention training as a diagnostic tool for measuring and improving workplace culture.
Pricing: Custom quotes. Pricing includes both training and analytics components.
7. Clear Law Institute
Website: clearlawinstitute.com
Clear Law Institute is a legally focused compliance training provider founded by attorney Mitch Bernstein, who spent years advising the US government and corporations on employment law. The platform's courses are built on a foundation of legal expertise, with content reviewed and updated by employment attorneys to ensure accuracy and alignment with current law.
Clear Law Institute's harassment prevention training is straightforward and legally rigorous. The courses use a presenter-led format with scenario illustrations, legal explanations, and knowledge assessments. While the production values are more modest than Traliant's cinematic approach or Kantola's branching video, the legal depth is excellent -- the content clearly explains not just what constitutes harassment, but the specific legal standards, burden of proof, employer liability frameworks, and employee rights under federal and state law.
The platform covers all mandating states and provides separate employee and supervisor versions. Content is available in English, Spanish, and Mandarin. The courses meet specific state requirements including California SB 1343, New York Section 201-g and NYC Stop Sexual Harassment Act, Illinois WSHA, Connecticut, and Delaware training mandates.
Clear Law Institute's pricing is notably more competitive than premium providers like Traliant. For organisations on a budget that prioritise legal accuracy over cinematic production, Clear Law Institute offers strong value.
Pros:
- Founded and authored by employment attorneys -- exceptional legal accuracy
- Competitive pricing compared to premium providers
- Covers all mandating states with proper employee/supervisor versions
- Content is clear, straightforward, and legally substantive
Cons:
- Production quality is more modest -- presenter-led rather than cinematic video
- Less engaging format may result in lower learner satisfaction scores
- Limited customisation options compared to Traliant or CompliQuest
- Content beyond harassment (DEI, cybersecurity, etc.) is limited
Best for: Budget-conscious organisations that prioritise legal accuracy and substance over production polish, particularly those with in-house legal teams that value legally rigorous content.
Pricing: Approximately $10-15/user/year. One of the more affordable options in this comparison.
8. Navex
Website: navex.com
Navex (formerly NAVEX Global) is an enterprise compliance management platform where harassment prevention training is one component of a broader ethics and compliance suite. The platform also includes incident management (anonymous hotlines/whistleblower reporting), policy management, third-party risk management, and compliance programme analytics.
Navex's harassment prevention training covers sexual harassment, workplace bullying, discrimination, retaliation, and bystander intervention. The courses are professionally produced with realistic workplace scenarios and meet requirements for all major mandating states. Content is available in 8+ languages, making it one of the more multilingual options in this comparison.
For enterprise organisations, Navex's integration between training and incident management is valuable. When employees complete harassment training, they are guided through the organisation's specific reporting channels (which may include Navex's own EthicsPoint hotline). If an employee reports an incident through the Navex system, the platform provides case management, investigation tracking, and trend analytics. This closed-loop approach connects training to actual reporting behaviour.
However, Navex is an enterprise platform with enterprise complexity and pricing. The harassment training component works best when integrated with Navex's broader suite rather than used as a standalone solution. Small and mid-sized organisations will find the platform over-engineered for their needs.
Pros:
- Part of a comprehensive enterprise compliance suite (training, incidents, policies, risk)
- Integration between training and incident management creates a closed-loop approach
- Available in 8+ languages -- strong multilingual support
- Decades of experience in ethics and compliance
Cons:
- Enterprise pricing and complexity -- not suitable for SMBs
- Harassment training is one module in a larger suite -- less specialised than Traliant
- Implementation can be lengthy and resource-intensive
- Video production quality is good but not best-in-class
Best for: Large enterprises that want harassment prevention training integrated with incident management, policy management, and broader compliance programme infrastructure.
Pricing: Enterprise custom quotes. Navex is typically sold as a multi-module suite.
Full Comparison Table
| Provider | Video Quality | State-Specific | Languages | Certifications | Custom Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traliant | Excellent (cinematic) | All mandating states | 12+ | Yes | Semi-custom (policies, branding, scenarios) |
| EasyLlama | Good (interactive) | All mandating states | 6+ | Yes | Basic (branding) |
| CompliQuest | High (expert-produced) | US + EU directives | Multiple | Yes | Fully custom (expert-built) |
| SHIFT by Moxie | Excellent (documentary) | CA, NY, IL, CT | 3 | Yes | Facilitator-guided |
| Kantola | Very good (branching video) | All mandating states | 3 | Yes | Policy integration |
| Emtrain | Good (workplace scenarios) | All mandating states | 4 | Yes | Limited |
| Clear Law Institute | Adequate (presenter-led) | All mandating states | 3 | Yes | Limited |
| Navex | Good (professional) | Major mandating states | 8+ | Yes | Limited |
Additional Feature Comparison
| Provider | Bystander Intervention | Manager Training | Culture Analytics | Broader Compliance | Approx. Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traliant | Yes | Yes (separate course) | No | Moderate (DEI, ethics) | Premium |
| EasyLlama | Basic | Yes (separate course) | No | Strong (US) | Mid-range |
| CompliQuest | Yes | Yes | No | Comprehensive (US + EU) | Custom |
| SHIFT by Moxie | Best-in-class | Yes | Basic | Limited | Mid-range |
| Kantola | Yes | Yes (extended version) | No | Limited | Mid-range |
| Emtrain | Yes | Yes | Best-in-class | Moderate | Custom |
| Clear Law Institute | Basic | Yes (separate course) | No | Limited | Budget-friendly |
| Navex | Yes | Yes | Via incident data | Comprehensive (enterprise) | Premium |
How to Choose the Right Platform
By Organisation Profile
US-only SMB (under 200 employees):
EasyLlama offers the fastest deployment and simplest administration. Clear Law Institute is the most budget-friendly option with strong legal accuracy. If you value video quality above all else, Traliant is worth the premium.
US-only mid-market (200-2,000 employees):
Traliant is the gold standard for US harassment training content and state-specific compliance. Kantola's interactive branching video format is a strong alternative for organisations that want more active learner engagement. Emtrain is compelling if your HR team wants culture analytics alongside training.
US-only enterprise (2,000+ employees):
Navex makes sense if you need harassment training integrated with incident management and broader compliance infrastructure. Traliant works well as a standalone harassment training solution at enterprise scale. SHIFT is a strong choice if your goal is genuine culture change rather than just compliance.
Multinational (US + EU operations):
CompliQuest is the strongest choice for organisations needing harassment prevention training alongside EU regulatory compliance (GDPR, EU workplace directives, whistleblower protection). No other platform in this comparison natively covers both US state-specific mandates and EU harassment/workplace directives in a single, integrated platform.
Culture-change focused:
SHIFT by Moxie and Emtrain are the two platforms most focused on genuine culture change rather than pure legal compliance. SHIFT's bystander intervention training is the best in the market. Emtrain's analytics provide data-driven insight into cultural risk.
Decision Matrix
| Your primary need | Recommended platform |
|---|---|
| Best US harassment content | Traliant |
| Fastest SMB deployment | EasyLlama |
| Global compliance (US + EU) | CompliQuest |
| Culture change and bystander intervention | SHIFT by Moxie |
| Interactive branching video | Kantola |
| Workplace culture analytics | Emtrain |
| Budget-friendly legal accuracy | Clear Law Institute |
| Enterprise compliance suite | Navex |
Need guidance on harassment prevention training for your organisation? Contact CompliQuest to discuss your compliance requirements across all jurisdictions.
Expert Perspective
"Effective harassment prevention training must go beyond describing prohibited conduct and telling employees to report. Training that actually prevents harassment teaches employees to recognise problematic behaviour at its earliest stages, empowers bystanders with specific intervention techniques, and holds managers accountable for maintaining a respectful workplace. The goal is not to produce employees who can define 'quid pro quo' and 'hostile work environment' on a quiz -- it is to create a culture where harassment is genuinely unacceptable and where every employee feels empowered to speak up."
— Chai Feldblum, former Commissioner, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Co-Chair of the EEOC Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace
This perspective is reflected in the EEOC's landmark Report of the Co-Chairs of the EEOC Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace (2016), which remains the most authoritative analysis of what makes harassment prevention training effective. The Task Force identified several key findings that should guide platform selection:
What the research says works:
| Element | Evidence | Platforms that do this well |
|---|---|---|
| Bystander intervention training | More effective than perpetrator-focused training | SHIFT, Traliant, CompliQuest |
| Manager-specific training | Managers are the first line of response | Traliant, Kantola, CompliQuest |
| Realistic, industry-specific scenarios | Relevance drives engagement and behaviour change | Traliant (custom scenarios), CompliQuest (custom) |
| Workplace civility approach | Broader than just harassment -- promotes respectful culture | SHIFT, Emtrain |
| Ongoing reinforcement | One-time training is insufficient | All platforms (with varying capabilities) |
What the research says does not work:
- Generic, legalistic training focused solely on definitions and reporting procedures
- Training that is clearly designed only to limit employer liability (the "check-the-box" approach)
- One-size-fits-all content that does not account for industry, role, or workplace dynamics
- Annual-only training with no reinforcement between sessions
The implication is clear: the cheapest platform is not necessarily the best value, and compliance with state mandates is the floor, not the ceiling. Organisations that invest in higher-quality, more engaging, and more customised training see better outcomes -- both in terms of reduced harassment incidents and improved workplace culture.
Conclusion
Harassment prevention training platforms range from budget-friendly compliance solutions to sophisticated culture-change tools. The right choice depends on your organisation's geographic scope, budget, training philosophy, and broader compliance needs.
Here is the summary:
- Best overall US harassment training: Traliant -- cinematic-quality video, state-specific compliance, legal expertise, and strong customisation. The gold standard for US-focused harassment prevention.
- Best for fast US SMB deployment: EasyLlama -- deploy compliant harassment training in hours with minimal administration.
- Best for global organisations (US + EU): CompliQuest -- the only platform in this comparison that natively covers US harassment mandates alongside EU workplace directives, GDPR, whistleblower protection, and broader regulatory compliance. Custom-built by expert team.
- Best for culture change: SHIFT by Moxie -- authentic documentary-style content with best-in-class bystander intervention training grounded in behavioural science.
- Best interactive learning: Kantola -- engaging branching video format with 30+ years of experience in harassment prevention.
- Best for culture analytics: Emtrain -- unique data-driven approach that uses training as a diagnostic tool for workplace culture health.
- Best budget option: Clear Law Institute -- legally rigorous content at competitive pricing.
- Best for enterprise suites: Navex -- harassment training integrated with incident management, policy management, and compliance programme infrastructure.
Regardless of which platform you choose, remember the EEOC's finding: training is most effective when it is relevant to employees' actual workplace, includes bystander intervention skills, holds managers accountable, and is reinforced over time -- not just completed annually to satisfy a mandate.
Explore CompliQuest courses | Get a free consultation
Frequently Asked Questions
Is harassment prevention training required by law?
Yes, in multiple US states and increasingly under EU/UK law. In the US, states including California (SB 1343, since 2019), New York (Section 201-g, since 2019), Illinois (WSHA, since 2020), Connecticut, Delaware, and Maine mandate specific harassment prevention training for employees and/or supervisors. At the federal level, the EEOC strongly recommends training as an element of a legally defensible anti-harassment programme, and courts routinely consider whether an employer provided training when evaluating harassment liability under Title VII. In the EU, the EU Directive on combating violence against women and domestic violence (2024) requires member states to implement preventive measures including training. In the UK, the Worker Protection Act 2023 (effective October 2024) introduced a proactive duty to prevent sexual harassment, effectively requiring training.
Which US states mandate harassment prevention training?
As of 2026, the states with explicit harassment training mandates include California (SB 1343 -- 1 hour for all employees, 2 hours for supervisors, every 2 years, employers with 5+ employees), New York (Section 201-g -- annual training for all employees, all employers), Illinois (WSHA -- annual training for all employees, all employers), Connecticut (2 hours for all employees and supervisors, employers with 3+ employees), Delaware (1 hour for employees, 2 hours for supervisors, every 2 years, employers with 50+ employees), Maine (education and training for all employees within 1 year of hire, employers with 15+ employees), and New York City (Stop Sexual Harassment Act -- annual training for all employees, employers with 15+ employees). Several additional states have introduced or are considering mandatory training legislation. Verify current requirements with legal counsel, as state laws are frequently updated.
How often should harassment training be conducted?
Frequency depends on your jurisdiction. California and Delaware require training every 2 years. New York, Illinois, and New York City require annual training. Connecticut requires initial training with supplemental training every 10 years. The EEOC Select Task Force on Harassment recommends regular, ongoing training rather than one-time compliance -- specifically highlighting that annual refresher training combined with periodic reinforcement (such as manager check-ins, culture assessments, and response to specific incidents) is more effective than standalone compliance training. Best practice is to train all new hires within their first 30-90 days and conduct refresher training at least annually, regardless of state mandates.
What should harassment prevention training cover?
Comprehensive harassment prevention training should cover: (1) Definitions -- what constitutes sexual harassment (quid pro quo and hostile work environment), non-sexual harassment, bullying, and discrimination under federal and applicable state law. (2) Examples -- realistic, industry-relevant scenarios depicting various forms of harassment. (3) Reporting -- how to report harassment internally (specific channels, contact information) and externally (EEOC, state agencies). (4) Bystander intervention -- specific techniques for intervening safely when witnessing inappropriate behaviour. (5) Retaliation -- explaining that retaliation is illegal and how to recognise it. (6) Manager responsibilities -- (for supervisor training) obligation to report, respond to complaints, and maintain documentation. (7) Company policies -- organisation-specific anti-harassment policies and procedures. The EEOC recommends that training include interactive elements, be tailored to the specific workplace and industry, and focus on building skills (not just transferring knowledge).
Is online harassment training as effective as in-person?
Research is mixed but generally favourable for well-designed online training. The EEOC Select Task Force noted that while in-person training can offer advantages (group discussion, facilitator expertise, real-time Q&A), quality online training with interactive elements, realistic scenarios, and knowledge assessments can be equally effective -- and offers significant practical advantages in scalability, consistency, documentation, and cost. Multiple states (including California and New York) explicitly permit online training to satisfy their mandates, provided the training is interactive (not passive video-only) and allows employees to ask questions and receive answers. The ideal approach for many organisations is "blended" -- online training supplemented with manager-led discussions, in-person workshops for high-risk roles, and ongoing reinforcement. All eight platforms in this comparison deliver compliant online training that satisfies state mandates.
What are California's specific harassment training requirements?
California's harassment prevention training requirements under SB 1343 (California Government Code Section 12950.1) are among the most prescriptive in the country: (1) Who -- all employees (not just supervisors) of organisations with 5 or more employees, including temporary and seasonal employees. (2) Duration -- 1 hour for non-supervisory employees, 2 hours for supervisors. (3) Frequency -- within 6 months of hire and every 2 years thereafter. (4) Content -- must cover sexual harassment (quid pro quo and hostile work environment), other forms of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, prevention strategies, remedies available, and resources for victims. Must include practical examples and be interactive. (5) Format -- classroom, e-learning, or webinar permitted, provided training is interactive and allows questions. (6) Trainer qualifications -- if using a live trainer, they must meet specific qualifications (attorney, HR professional with 2+ years experience, or law professor). (7) Documentation -- employers must maintain training records for at least 2 years. The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH, now CRD) provides a free online training tool that meets minimum requirements, though most organisations opt for more comprehensive commercial solutions. All platforms in this comparison meet California SB 1343 requirements.
Related Insights
- California Harassment Training Requirements -- detailed guide to SB 1343 compliance.
- Ethics Training for Employees -- building an ethical workplace culture.
- Regulatory Compliance Training -- comprehensive compliance training overview.
- Best Compliance Training Platforms Compared -- broader compliance platform comparison.
- Best Cybersecurity Awareness Training Providers -- security awareness platform comparison.
CompliQuest Harassment Prevention Training
- Harassment Prevention Courses -- expert-built training for US and EU compliance.
- Workplace Safety Training -- comprehensive workplace compliance.
- Custom Training Solutions -- bespoke courses for your policies and industry.
- GDPR Compliance Training -- EU data protection for harassment investigations.